
Recent Posts
Category Cloud
Book Reviews Books Discourse Analysis English Ephesians Exegesis Grammar Greek Hebrew Hermeneutics Humor Language Language Learning Lexicography Linguistics Linking Logos Bible Software Mediations Morphology Musings news stories Other Pragmatics Questions Semantics Series Syntax Textual Criticism TNIV Translation
Librarything…
- Theories of Case (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) by Miriam ButtCambridge University Press (2006), Paperback, 272 pages
- A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity by A.-F. ChristidisCambridge University Press (2007), Edition: Rev. & Expanded Translation of the Greek Text, Hardcover, 1660 pages
- Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) by William CroftCambridge University Press (2004), Edition: 1St Edition, Paperback, 372 pages
- From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language (A Bradford Book) by Jerome FeldmanThe MIT Press (2006), Edition: 1, Hardcover, 384 pages
- Concept, Image, and Symbol (Cognitive Linguistic Research) by Ronald W. LangackerMouton De Gruyter (2002), Edition: 2, Paperback, 395 pages
Blogroll
- Awilum
- Better Bibles Blog
- Chrisendoom
- Crypto-theology
- Dave
- Discipulus Scripturae
- Esteban Vázquez
- Fruit of His Lips
- Gegraptai
- Gentle Wisdom
- Greek Language and Linguistics
- Hesed we \’emet
- πᾶσα γραφὴ
- σφοδρα – exceedingly
- ΑΓΑΠΗΣΕΙΣ – You shall love
- Lexical-Functional Greek
- Lingamish
- New Testament Discourse
- New Testament Interpretation
- Nick Norelli
- nijay k gupta
- NT Gateway
- Pastoral Epistles
- Rico
- Son of the Fathers
- SportLinguist
- Stephen C. Carlson
- sunestauromai – living the crucified life
- Suzanne
- Text, Community
- Textual Criticism
All Rights Reserved
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.


It’s a bit sketchy. Evangelical Textual Criticism came in at Junior High level, znd no offence to Josh, but A New Testament Student came in at Genius level — that can’t be right.
I also think that your blog and Tilling’s should be higher than mine. But what do I know?
Let me clear up that last comment because re-reading it, it came off sounding wrong. I’m not saying that Josh’s blog can’t be at the genius level (I’d personally put it at college-undergrad) — What I meant was that I think the Evangelical Textual Criticism blog is much more technical and requires a higher reading level than Josh’s — so their getting a Junior High rating can’t be right in comparison. Hope that makes more sense. I certainly wasn’t trying to ‘diss’ Josh’s stuff.
well, i thought it was pretty funny. my guess is that the program doesn’t examine foreign language…?
i don’t know
I’m curious as to what criteria it uses to render its results. I wonder if there’s any way to find out…
i don’t know…
Pingback: Thoughts on Antiquity » Blog Archive » Genius Blog
Ha ha! Check out mine.
Really, you could all stand to learn something from us Genius bloggers
Guys, guys, don’t take that gadget seriously! I seriously doubt that it measures anything correctly.
That said, I PWNED ALL Y’ALL’S RATINGS!!! 1337!!!
show off…
i don’t think anyone is taking it seriously.
So all you hoity toity biblio-blogger, Greek knowing, seminary professor/student, pastor bloggers are going to be embarrassed about your blogs being Junior High level.
I was surprised my Suffering Christians came in at Grad level. It’s mainly just quotes and Scripture. But then Scripture Zealot came in at Junior High level. I suppose I should either be glad it’s understandable or I need to use bigger words.
Oh, I know. I just wanted an opportunity to note that I got an awesome rating.
A New Testament Student came in at Genius level — that can’t be right.
I laughed so hard when reading this….in the middle of the library.
As a librarian, I thoroughly disapprove.
Josh,
I pray you didn’t take offense… I know it came off sounding wrong the way I originally said it. But I share Mike’s disapproval… Libraries are for napping, not laughing
just turn off your cell phone. that’s all I ask.
I do turn off my cell phone. And normally Biblioblog reading doesn’t lend itself to laughing, but that really was funny. I didn’t take offense at all. Just the non-chalant “That can’t be right.” I’m still laughing!