Comments on Strauss’ Paper

In the comments to the first part of Strauss’ paper posted to the Better Bibles Blog, Peter Kirk made probably the most humorous comment I’ve seen all day.

At least ESV as it currently is has found a niche market among those who believe that archaic and unclear language is the sign of a proper Bible, and that clarifying such language is the job of a preacher.

You may not agree with the statement, but its still funny. I’m glad somebody is catering to that market…

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Comments on Strauss’ Paper”

  1. Mike, this wasn’t actually intended to be humorous, but very serious! There really are people who “believe that archaic and unclear language is the sign of a proper Bible, and that clarifying such language is the job of a preacher”. But the people who write this explicitly are mostly KJV-only types.

  2. I’m sorry, Peter, I just thought it sounded funny, because while there are people who think like that, they don’t realize how ridiculous it sounds when its actually stated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s